I haven't used the new dynamic EQ in Ozone, but it looks a lot like Pro-MB, and Melda's UI is a lot easier to use than either of them. At any rate, these days I'll use Meldaproduction's MDynamicEQ rather than a multiband anyway, so neither Ozone nor FabFilter wins this round. Multi-band compressor: I haven't used Ozone's multiband compressor for a long time, but I like it better than Pro-MB despite the latter's beautiful UI. Even in projects where I'm using all FabFilter stuff on the master, there'll still be an instance of Ozone just for the exciter. Exciter: FabFilter's answer to Ozone's exciter module is Saturn, which is more versatile if you want severe distortion but isn't nearly as good as Ozone for more subtle applications. If had to choose one over the other, it'd be Pro-L, but not by much. Its Dynamic mode is awesome for drum busses. That's my choice for individual tracks and sub-busses, and for more aggressive and louder styles. Pro-L, OTOH, is capable of more clinical tweaking. Throw it on, quickly dial in a threshold while watching SPAN's K-14 meter and you're done. Limiter: I tend to use Ozone's limiter for the easy projects that don't call for a lot of master bus manipulation. FabFilter - I use both, but for different things.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |